North River Insurance v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Defendant Allstate Insurance Company seeks a stay of this action pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3, so that arbitration may be had of a dispute arising out of a series of treaty reinsurance agreements between the parties. Plaintiffs North River Insurance Company and the United States Fire Insurance Company contend that the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars defendant from seeking further arbitration of the liability issues in the parties’ dispute. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to stay this action pending…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ace Capital Re Overseas Ltd. v. Central United Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company John Hancock Distr Larry Carter v. Thomas W. OlickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- New York Hotel and Motel Trades Council v. Hotel St. GeorgeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- W. Dow Hamm III Corp. v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
- Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.