Legal Opinion

Continental Developers, Ltd. v. Hensel

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1977No. 5719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

KIDWELL, J.

This action was brought by Appellant against George Eddy Hensel and Jeannette H. Lent to recover the sum of $5000 paid as a deposit by Appellant under a “Deposit Receipt, Offer and Acceptance” contract (DROA) entered into between Appellant as buyer, and Hensel, as seller. Although only Hensel is named as seller in the DROA, he was unserved and the action has proceeded against defendant-appellee Jeannette H. Lent as though she were the seller. After trial to the court, judgment was entered in favor of Appellee Lent against Appellant, for the sum of $5000,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. LanniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Johnson v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Nelson v. JardineIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BellHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Scotella v. OsgoodHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. PR Pension Fund v. NakadaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Shaffer v. Earl Thacker Co., Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API