Stockton Iron Works v. Walters
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County denying a motion for a new trial. C¡ W. Norton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action brought by plaintiff against defendant to recover the sum of $1,460, alleged to be owing for work performed and materials furnished in the repairing of a steamer called the “H. E. Wright.”
In his amended answer defendant admitted that plaintiff performed certain work and furnished certain materials, but denied that they were for the “repair of said steamer ‘H. E. Wright, ’ ” but alleges that plaintiff entered into an agreement with defendant whereby plaintiff agreed to construct and place in said steamer a certain steel shaft and its necessary attachments (describing them),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mock v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. UrquidasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Great Western Gold Co. v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Crescent Feather Co. v. United Upholsterers' Union, Local No. 28California Supreme Court · 1908
- Sutton v. StephanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957