Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Ibarra

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2006No. 20050357PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Esteban Ibarra appeals from an amended judgment and decree denying him visitation with his minor daughter. We conclude the district court’s findings are insufficiently detailed to support a total ban on all visitation, and therefore, we reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] Ibarra and Ruth Jewel Wilson were married at Wahpeton on May 13, 2000, about eight months after their daughter was born. During the marriage and earlier in their relationship, Ibarra was an alcoholic who physically abused Wilson, resulting in several criminal charges. After the child was born, Ibarra…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Healy v. HealyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Johnson v. SchlotmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cavendish Farms, Inc. v. Mathiason Farms, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Helfenstein v. SchuttNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Taylor v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Schlieve v. SchlieveNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Vetter v. Vetter, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API