Legal Opinion

Helfenstein v. Schutt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2007No. 20060383PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jacqueline Schutt appeals the district court’s October 31, 2006 order denying her motion for a new trial, denying her motion to amend judgment, and ordering her to pay attorney’s fees. Schutt also appeals the district court’s August 16, 2006 order denying her modification of visitation and family therapy requests. We affirm the district court’s October 31, 2006 order. We also affirm that part of the court’s August 16, 2006 order denying the motion to modify visitation, but reverse that portion of the order relating to family therapy and remand for further proceedings…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Gierke v. GierkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wigginton v. WiggintonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Lovin v. LovinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hanson v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. DUFNER v. TrottierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Wolt v. WoltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API