Legal Opinion · Dissent

Willott v. Beachwood Village

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1963No. 25924Published

1DissentHurd, J.

It should be clearly stated and emphasized that the property here involved is essentially and peculiarly adapted for a shopping center because it is an expensive tract of eighty acres of undeveloped land bounded by four main highways which effectively divide it from surrounding-property.

This eighty acre tract is bounded by Ohio State Boute No. 1, a four hundred foot highway on the east; by Shaker Boulevard, a divided highway occupied by two sixty foot road highways and a four hundred foot center strip, on the north; Bichmond Boad or as it is sometimes known, State Highway Boute No. 175, one…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pecora v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Root v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Clifton Hills Realty Co. v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Cleveland Trust Co. v. Village of BrooklynOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API