Legal Opinion

Cornwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided June 2, 2005No. 4:03-CV-40650Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GRITZNER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk’s No. 9). Plaintiffs resist the requested action. Attorney for the Plaintiffs is Charles Gribble; attorney for the Defendant is Henry Harmon. Neither party has requested a hearing on the motion, and the Court finds none is necessary. Accordingly, the Court considers the motion fully submitted and ready for ruling.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The Plaintiffs, Amy Cornwell (“Corn-well”) and Darren Cornwell (collectively, “the Cornwells”), commenced this…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Lipson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API