Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Township of Woodbridge

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 9, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Oil demurrer to declaration/

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

The declaration in this case alleges that the defendant-constructed a public sewer, consisting of a twelve-inch'drain-pipe, in one of the public streets of the township, •for the benefits of ■ which’ the plaintiffs' and other"property owners were assessed; that - the plaintiffs’ dwelling-house, *29situate on that street, is connected with the- sewer by piping properly laid; that for want of proper pitch or fall, or for want of sufficient capacity, 'the sewer, ever since such connection was made, has caused the céllar of the plaintiffs’ house to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Seifert v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Johnston v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Waters v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woodsum v. Pemberton Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  2. Cloyes v. Delaware Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. McCloud v. Parish of JeffersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. City of Globe v. ShuteArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  5. PANEPINTO v. Edmart, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API