Legal Opinion

PANEPINTO v. Edmart, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 18, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

129 N.J. Super. 319 (1974)

323 A.2d 533

JOHN PANEPINTO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,

v.

EDMART, INC. AND APKEL BUILDING CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS, AND CITY OF BAYONNE AND HENRY E. KRUSE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 21, 1974.

Decided July 18, 1974.

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, FRITZ and DEMOS.

Mr. M. Stanley Susskind argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Marvin S. Davidson argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Francis P. Meehan, Jr., attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLOVSKY, P.J.A.D.

In 1965…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fagliarone v. North Bergen Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. Hoy v. CapelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  3. Bedrock Foundations, Inc. v. Geo. H. Brewster & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Willis v. Dept. of Cons. & Ec. Dev.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  5. Barney's Furniture Warehouse of Newark, Inc. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Borough of Franklin Lakes v. MutzbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API