Legal Opinion

United States v. Kurt Orban Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided December 5, 1963No. A.R.D. 163; Entry Nos. 955170; 745859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Defendant below lias appealed from tlie reap-praisement decision of the trial judge in two consolidated cases. Kurt Orban Company, Incorporated v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 392, Reap. Dec. 10338. Appellant alleges as error, inter alia, the finding below (by amended decision) that the principal markets for sale of the imported merchandise were the factories of the respective manufacturers. Appellant argues that there is no probative evidence to support such finding.

Appellant’s contention is that plaintiff below failed to make a prima facie case and that judgment, therefore,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Ricks v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Kurt Orban Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tapetes Luxor, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Allen Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Joseph Markovits, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Tapetes Luxor, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API