Legal Opinion
Walker v. Thornsberry
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1979No. Civ. 17824Published
1Opinion of the Court
97 Cal.App.3d 842 (1979)
158 Cal. Rptr. 862
A. WALKER, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
DOYAL THORNSBERRY, Defendant and Appellant.
Docket No. 17824.
Court of Appeals of California, Third District.
October 18, 1979.
COUNSEL
Hiram S. Dillin and David A. Short for Defendant and Appellant.
Gary L. Sweet and Richard L. Enkelis for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
EVANS, J.
Defendant Thornsberry appeals from an adverse $9,447.96 judgment. We affirm.
Plaintiff is the assignee for collection of an account receivable of Super Secur Comfort Stations (Super Secur), a division of Aluminum Plumbing Fixture Corporation.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Rushing v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Davis Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Johnson v. MattoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Walker v. ThornsberryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.