Saakyan v. Modern Auto, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Introduction
In this personal injury lawsuit, we deal with a narrow question concerning statutory offers to compromise under Code of Civil Procedure section 998. 1 The issue arises because this case was tried twice. The first trial resulted in a defense verdict and judgment for defendant, Modem Auto, Inc., which were then set aside by the grant of a motion for new trial. The second trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs, Oganes Saakyan and Gamick Paronyan. Following the second trial, the court denied plaintiffs’ motions for expert witness fees (§ 998, subd. (d)) and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Barella v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Elrod v. Oregon Cummins Diesel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Homeowner's Ass'n v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martinez v. Brownco Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Gordon v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Negron v. Melchiorre, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
- Ayers v. FCA US, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024