Legal Opinion

Saakyan v. Modern Auto, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 2002No. B146328PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

Introduction

In this personal injury lawsuit, we deal with a narrow question concerning statutory offers to compromise under Code of Civil Procedure section 998. 1 The issue arises because this case was tried twice. The first trial resulted in a defense verdict and judgment for defendant, Modem Auto, Inc., which were then set aside by the grant of a motion for new trial. The second trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs, Oganes Saakyan and Gamick Paronyan. Following the second trial, the court denied plaintiffs’ motions for expert witness fees (§ 998, subd. (d)) and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Barella v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Elrod v. Oregon Cummins Diesel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Homeowner's Ass'n v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Brownco Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Gordon v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Negron v. Melchiorre, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006
  4. Ayers v. FCA US, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API