Legal Opinion
Adams v. Garland
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2020-3384Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) FRANK ADAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-3384 (TSC) ) MERRICK GARLAND, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Frank Adams applied for a job with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) in 2012 and again in 2014. Ultimately, the FBI deemed him unsuitable for employment. Six years later, he filed this lawsuit against Merrick Garland in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, alleging that the FBI refused to hire him because of his race, age, and disability, and retaliated…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.