Legal Opinion
Alexandru v. Dowd
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 16, 2003No. AC 22938PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiff, Michaela I. Alexandru, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Glenn W. Dowd. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly rendered summary judgment in favor of the defendant because it improperly determined that the defendant had an absolute privilege. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the plaintiffs claim. The operative complaint in this case is the third amended complaint, filed on October 20, 2000. It consists…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hopkins v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Alexandru v. StrongConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Dlugokecki v. VieiraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Simms v. SeamanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.