Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Gillenwater, Ii
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 17, 2013No. 11-30363, 12-30027PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAEZ, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Charles Lee Gillenwater, II, appeals the district court’s order finding him incompetent to stand trial. The district court made its determination after ordering a psychological examination of Gillenwater and conducting a pretrial competency hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 4241, 4247. At the hearing, Gillenwater sought to testify against the advice of his counsel. This led to a disruptive outburst from Gillenwater, which prompted the district court to remove him from the courtroom. As a result, Gillenwater was not permitted to testify during the hearing.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shawn Shannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Charles Gillenwater, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Andrew KowalczykCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Malcolm Roy EvansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. BrennanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.