United States v. Andrew Kowalczyk
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
During the long running course of Andrew Kowalczyk’s prosecution for production of child pornography the district comet conducted two separate competency hearings to determine whether Kowalczyk was competent to stand trial. During the second competency hearing, the district court appointed amicus counsel. After both competency hearings the district court found Kowalczyk incompetent to stand trial and referred Kowalczyk to a federal medical center for further evaluation. Kowalczyk appeals the second commitment order. Kowalczyk argues that the second competency…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Sonia QuinteroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Neil A. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Haitham AlhindiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
- State of Louisiana v. Nytilex JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.