State v. Rohdes
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Several issues are presented for review by this court by appeal and cross-appeal, each of which will be addressed in turn. For the reasons set forth below, we must reverse the appellate court’s ruling and reinstate that of the trial court.
I
The first issue concerns the definition of a lesser included offense. R.C. 2945.74 provides, in pertinent part: “* * * [I]f other offenses are included within the offense charged, the jury may find the defendant not guilty of the degree charged but guilty of an inferior degree thereof or lesser included offense.” This court has held “[a]n offense may be a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Ohio v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. KidderOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. DeverOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. LynchOhio Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.