Thames v. Louisville N. R. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
The appeal in this cause is based solely upon the action of the trial court in granting the defendant a new trial upon grounds 47 to 57, inclusive, as contained in the motion, the said trial court having expressly overruled the motion as to all other grounds. The questions involved in the grounds upon which the motion was granted tended to impress upon the jury tlie fact that the defendant had settled with Miss Yerby and in effect admitted its liability to her and was contesting the plaintiff’s right to recover, notwithstanding Miss Yerby was the driver of the automobile and may have been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Watson v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Choate v. Alabama Great Southern R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Tennessee Coal, Iron R. R. Co. v. SpicerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Birmingham Infirmary v. CoeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kilcrease v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Alabama Clay Products Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Watts v. EspySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Alabama Great Southern R. v. Ensley Transfer & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Taylor v. Brownell-O'Hear Pontiac CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.