Legal Opinion
Glaberson v. Comcast Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 12, 2013No. Civil Action No. 03-6604Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PADOVA, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is the Motion of Comcast Corporation, et al. (“Com-cast”) to strike the Plaintiffs’ Motion to re-certify the Philadelphia class. (Doc. No. 564.) For the reasons that follow, we deny Comcast’s Motion and permit it to file a substantive response to the Plaintiffs’ Motion.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 27, 2013, the United States Supreme Court reversed the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit’s affirmation of our decision granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to certify the Philadelphia class. Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, - U.S. -,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Lindy Pen Company, Inc. Blackfeet Plastics, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Bic Pen Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.