Legal Opinion
Subasic v. State of Oregon
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 28, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00553Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON SLOBODAN SUBASIC, Case No. 3:24-cv-00553-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. THE STATE OF OREGON by and through the OREGON LIQUOR AND CANNABIS COMMISSION, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, and RICH EVANS, TRAVIS HAMPTON, LAURA GOMEZ, BERRI LESLIE, BRIAN LIGHT, NATHAN RIX, DANICA FOSTER, and CRAIG PRINS, as individuals, Defendants. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Slobodan Subasic (“Subasic”) filed this action against the State of Oregon, by and through the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission (“OLCC”), the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Julie Holmgren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America v. Mark Torf, Torf Environmental Management, in Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Dennis D. Ellis, Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Mark Torf/torf Environmental Management), United States of America, Ponderosa Paint Manufacturing, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. RuehleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.