Legal Opinion

Criterion Holding Co. v. Cerussi

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.

This is a motion to strike out the defendants’ counterclaim as insufficient in law, and for summary judgment. The counterclaim alleges that the corporate defendant, of which the defendant Cerussi was the principal stockholder, was in financial difficulty. Its applications to various financial institutions for a building loan of $125,000 had been refused. After exhausting all other sources, it employed the Golran Realty Corporation as its agent for that purpose, and through it applied to the New York Title and Mortgage Company for such a loan on the representation of the Golran Realty…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Adams v. SchifferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. Edgar A. Levy Leasing Company, Inc. v. . SiegelNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. McPherson v. . CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Vyne v. GlennMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Distillers Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  2. Shire Realty Corp. v. SchorrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Starks v. FieldWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Gallagher Switchboard Corp. v. Heckler Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Fizzell v. MeekerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API