People v. Hicks
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Gratiot. (Hart, J.) Eespondent was convicted of engaging in the business of selling liquor without having complied with the provisions-of the law of 1887. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This case comes to this Court on exceptions before sentence.
The information under which the respondent was con*459victed charges that he was on May 19, 1888, unlawfully engaged in the business of selling and keeping for sale spirituous and intoxicating and malt, brewed, and fermented liquors at retail, without first having paid the tax required by law, and that he did not have the required notice posted, he not being then and there a druggist, etc. The information is filed under the provisions of Act No. '313, Laws of 1887.
It appears - that the respondent had carried on the saloon business at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re HauckMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CaldwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. KemmisMichigan Supreme Court · 1908