Claim of McDonald v. Danforth
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Peters, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 12, 2000, as amended by decision filed December 18, 2000, which ruled that claimant’s psoriasis was causally related to his employment and made an award of benefits.
In August 1996, claimant sustained a small burn to his hand while working in heavy construction. The lesion did not heal and he began to develop other lesions on his hand. The condition was diagnosed as psoriasis, which ultimately affected his feet, knees and elbows, as well as his hands. The treating dermatologist reported that pressure on claimant’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Claim of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Claim of Perez v. Pearl-Wick Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Barber v. StanleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Ricci v. W.J. Riegel & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Strouse v. Village of EndicottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Floyd v. Millard Fillmore HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Pistone v. Sam's ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Cook-Schoonover v. Corning HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of McKenzie v. UJA-FEDAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Palmer v. State University of New York Upstate Medical UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.