Davies, Turner & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kichaedson, Judge:
This protest involves the importation of bottle blowing machines from Middlesex, England, to Philadelphia, Pa., which were assessed with duty as articles having as an essential feature an electrical device or element, not specially provided for, at 13% percent ad valorem under paragraph 353. This appraisement was *56at a value higher than the entered value, and the entries were subsequently liquidated.
The plaintiff claims that the liquidation was premature, illegal, null, and void in that no written notice of advance in value was given by the collector of customs to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schayer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Smith v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Koval v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Prete v. FinkelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- United States v. International Importers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969