Legal Opinion
Riverside County Department of Public Social Services v. C.B.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 13, 2009No. E046005PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, J.
The parents of Ka.B., Kr.B. and D.B. appeal from an order terminating their parental rights and placing the children for adoption. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)1 They contend that, following our limited remand in their prior appeal from the termination order (In re K.B. (Dec. 7, 2006, E039777) [nonpub. opn.]) for compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.), the juvenile court erred by failing to vacate its disposition order and by finding, in compliance *1279with ICWA’s requirements, that “active efforts” were made to prevent the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- People ex rel. A.V.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- People in Interest of M.VColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- Yvonne L. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Amber L.California Court of Appeal · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.