Yvonne L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Judge.
¶ 1 Yvonne L. (“Mother”) appeals from the superior court’s order severing her parental rights to E.L., L.L., and D.L. 1 Because the children are members of the Tohono O’Odham Nation, these proceedings are subject to the Indian Child Welfare Act (“ICWA”). 2 In addition to the Arizona Department of Eco nomie Security (“ADES”), the Nation was a party to the termination proceedings and requested leave to file a brief in this appeal. We granted that request. For reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment and the superior court’s conclusion that clear and convincing evidence…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kent K. v. Bobby M.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Dean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Audra v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People ex rel. A.V.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Yodell B.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Charles v. v. DcsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Chelsea R. v. Dcs, H.R.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.