Legal Opinion
San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Carlsbad
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1998No. D027407PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
In this declaratory relief action, the trial court granted summary judgment to plaintiff and respondent San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (SDG&E) and against defendants and appellants the City of Carlsbad and its officials (City), on the ground that City’s effort to regulate, by way of City’s floodplain management regulations (Carlsbad Mun. Code (CMC), ch. 21.110 et seq.), the deposit of sand dredged from a lagoon adjacent to SDG&E’s power plant upon state beaches within the city limits, was invalid as preempted by the constitutional and statutory scheme applicable to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- California Coastal Commission v. Granite Rock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Grant-Burton v. Covenant Care, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Virgil Barham v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Garcia v. Four Points Sheraton LAXCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Malish v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- City of Anaheim v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.