Legal Opinion

Grosshans v. Rueping

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1967PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The Grosshanses and Rueping are adjoining landowners, and a dispute arises out of two conveyances by the common grantors, Virgil Strait and his wife. Prior to August 16, 1947, the Straits owned all of the land presently owned by the Grosshanses and Rueping, the description in their deed reading as follows:

“The North Half (N %) of Southwest Quarter (SW %) of Section Ten (10), Township Twelve (12) North, of Range Six (6) East, except a parcel of .354 acres as described in a highway conveyance from the grantors to Sauk County, recorded in Volume 144 of Deeds, page 73 Records of Sauk County,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spence v. FrantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Elofrson v. LindsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Thorndike v. Milwaukee Auditorium Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Zeisler Corp. v. PageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Juif v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Denzer v. RouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Konneker v. RomanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Rikkers v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Buza v. WojtalewiczWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Northrop v. OppermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API