Legal Opinion
Olivarius v. Stanley J. Sarnoff Endowment for Cardiovascular Science, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 9, 2004No. 02-CV-471, 02-CV-813, 02-CV-814PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
The main issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying a motion to vacate a final judgment confirming an arbitration award that allegedly had been procured by fraud. To decide that issue, we must explore the potential bases for such a motion that are set forth in Superi- or Court Civil Rule 60(b). Ultimately we conclude that the motion in this case was untimely under Rule 60(b), and non-compliant in other respects as well with that Rule’s requirements, and hence that the motion properly was denied.
A second issue before us, raised in the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. BeggerlySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia Appeal of Edwin A. Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Parker v. K & L Gates, LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Threatt v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Goldschmidt v. Paley Rothman Goldstein Rosenberg & Cooper, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re Estate of DrakeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Mitchell v. GalesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.