Legal Opinion
In Re King
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided October 20, 2010No. 19-30108PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAURA K. GRANDY, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case presents the issue of whether debtors, who had above-median income at the time that their Chapter 13 petition was filed, may, post-confirmation, reduce their plan duration to a period of less than sixty months without also providing for full repayment to unsecured creditors.
FACTS
Debtors Michael and Linda King (“Debtors”) filed a Chapter 13 petition on December 8, 2005. Because their income at filing exceeded the applicable median family income in Illinois, debtors were required to propose a sixty-month plan. 1 Their Second Amended Plan, which…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- In Re SlusherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2007
- Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- In Re GrutschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011
- In Re DavisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- In Re BuckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010
- In Re HeidekerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.