Legal Opinion

Kahl v. Winfrey

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1956No. 6057PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Plaintiff (appellant) L. H. Kahl brought an action in replevin against defendants (appellees) E. B. Winfrey and wife which resulted in a money judgment being entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. After denial of the latter’s motion for a new trial this appeal was taken from the judgment. The designation by which the parties appeared in the trial court will be used.

The chain of events giving rise to this suit is as follows: plaintiff sold to defendant E. B. Winfrey under a single conditional sales contract — on the usual printed form used by plaintiff — two items…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gillespie Land & Irrigation Co. v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Waddell v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Brazee v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Fry v. ShipleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Durazo v. AyersArizona Supreme Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mousa v. SabaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Commercial Credit Equipment Corp. v. KnowltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hackin v. GaynesArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Olympic Land Co., Inc. v. SmithartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Aero Nautical Leasing Corp. v. Arimetco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API