Legal Opinion

People v. Kuntze

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1963No. Calendar 98, Docket 49,788PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

Defendants were convicted of possession of part of a deer in violation of CLS 1956, § 312.9 (Stat Ann 1958 Bev § 13.1338), a misdemeanor. Their motion, made before trial and preserved for review, to suppress evidence essential to their conviction on the ground that it had been obtained by an illegal search and seizure in violation of their constitutional rights, was denied. They appeal, claiming the trial court erred in denying their motion to suppress.

One evening in September of 1960, after nightfall, State Police Troopers Schwab and Bighter were proceeding by patrol car to a point west of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. People v. WhalenMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. RileyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. McDonaldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. People v. ParisiMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. MalloryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API