Legal Opinion

People v. McDonald

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1968No. Docket 2,890PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The defendant was convicted of breaking and entering in the nighttime. After commission of the offense for which defendant was convicted, the legislature eliminated the statutory distinction between nighttime and daytime breaking and entering, thereupon repealing the statutory provision making nighttime breaking and entering a crime. Defendant claims that prosecutions for offenses committed under the nighttime provision before such “repeal” were barred by the legislative action. He also asserts the trial judge erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence .obtained by an allegedly…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. DegraffenreidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. EddingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. MasonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API