Legal Opinion

Raines v. Gould, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 1986No. 0692PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sanders, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court holding respondent George B. Raines was not a “statutory employee” of appellant Gould, Inc. pursuant to the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act so as to bar his right to sue for damages arising out of a personal injury. We affirm.

Raines was injured while employed by a subcontractor to install an electrical system at a plant being constructed for Gould by a general contractor. Raines received workers’ compensation benefits for his injury from the subcontractor and then brought this action seeking to recover damages.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. McReynoldsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  2. Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. Packett v. Moretown Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1917
  5. Boseman v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cinnamon v. International Business MacHines Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  2. Glass v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Stone v. Door-Man Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  4. Keene v. CNA Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  5. Revels v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API