Legal Opinion

State of Colo. v. Idarado Min. Co.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided April 9, 1990No. 83-C-2385PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARRIGAN, District Judge.

On March 7, 1989, the plaintiff State of Colorado (“the State”) filed a motion to amend the court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order filed February 22, 1989, State of Colorado v. Idarado Min. Co., 707 F.Supp. 1227 (D.Colo.1989), to award the State approximately $1.9 million in response costs incurred prior to March 31, 1987. Defendants filed a response opposing the motion.

On October 2,1989, the court ordered the parties to supplement their briefs on the past response costs issue. The parties have filed their supplemental briefs.

Defendants have notified this court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985
  3. United States v. MottoloDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1988
  4. General Electric Co. v. Litton Business Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989
  5. Petrie v. CommissionerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Colorado v. Idarado Mining Company, and Third-Party v. Baumgartner Oil Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. City of Wichita, Kansas v. Trustees of APCO Oil Corp. Liquidating TrustDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  3. Colorado v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  4. State of Colo. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  5. West American Insurance Co. v. BaumgartnerColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API