Legal Opinion

Petrie v. Commissioner

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided April 5, 1988No. CV-S-88-74-PMPPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

PRO, District Judge.

In this action, BRANKA PETRIE (“Plaintiff’), appearing pro se, claims that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Defendant”) has unlawfully assessed and levied upon her wages, (specifically, her “toke envelopes” or tips), in an effort to collect allegedly delinquent federal income taxes. 1 On February 3,1988, Plaintiff filed a Complaint and Motion for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction (# 1), in which she asserts that the levy is invalid on various procedural grounds, and seeks to enjoin the IRS from enforcing the levy. On February 4, 1988, the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. GULF COAST GALVANIZING v. Steel Sales Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1993
  2. Remlinger v. State of Nev.District Court, D. Nevada · 1995
  3. Church of the Isaiah 58 Project of Arizona, Inc. v. La Paz CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Bajenski v. ChivateroDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
  5. State of Colo. v. Idarado Min. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API