Legal Opinion

Colorado v. United States

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided November 17, 1994No. 83-C-2386PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CARRIGAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, the State of Colorado, seeks to recover from the United States and Shell Oil Company (Shell) response costs incurred from January 1, 1989 through June 30, 1992, in connection with the Rocky Mountain Arsenal (RMA) cleanup and litigation. Cost reimbursement is sought pursuant to section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). Before trial to the court commenced on October 31, 1994, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
In the Matter of Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., Debtor. United States Environmental Protection Agency v. Sequa Corporation and Chromalloy American Corp., United States of America v. Bell Petroleum Services, Inc., Regal International, Inc. And John R. Leigh, Sequa Corporation and Chromalloy American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
United States v. Rohm and Haas Company Rohm and Haas Delaware Valley, Inc. Chemical Properties, Inc. Bristol Township AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
United States v. HardageDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1990
United States v. Northernaire Plating Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

State of Colo. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994