Legal Opinion
Pratt v. First Hays Banshares, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 7, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-2575-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Defendant states several grounds for dismissal, including lack of subject matter jurisdiction, no case or controversy, failure to join an indispensable party, lack of real party standing, and existence, of an identical pending state court action. Defendant also requests oral argument on its motion. The court has determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this matter. Rule 206(d), Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Prudential Oil Corporation v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- T. O. Bradbury and N. B. Burt v. Frank DennisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Sylvester Jones v. J. Martin HadicanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Attorneys Trust v. Videotape Computer Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- First Hays Banshares, Inc. v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6178, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,118 Attorneys Trust, and Cmc Magnetics Corporation AKA Cmc, a Republic of China Corporation, Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Videotape Computer Products, Inc., for Itself & Dba Video Computer Products, Inc., and Videotape Products, Inc., Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Sorenson v. Car Store USADistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Sorenson v. Car Store USADistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025