Legal Opinion
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6178, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,118 Attorneys Trust, and Cmc Magnetics Corporation AKA Cmc, a Republic of China Corporation, Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Videotape Computer Products, Inc., for Itself & Dba Video Computer Products, Inc., and Videotape Products, Inc., Cross-Claimant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1996No. 95-55410Published
1Opinion of the Court
93 F.3d 593
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6178, 96 Daily Journal
D.A.R. 10,118
ATTORNEYS TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
CMC Magnetics Corporation aka CMC, a Republic of China
Corporation, Cross-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
VIDEOTAPE COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC., for itself & dba Video
Computer Products, Inc., Defendant-Appellee,
and
Videotape Products, Inc., Cross-claimant-Appellee.
No. 95-55410.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted July 11, 1996.
Decided Aug. 20, 1996.
Richard C. Harding and W. Michael Mayock, Pasadena, California, for plaintiff-appellant Attorneys Trust and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Donald H. Albrecht, and Joanne Albrecht v. William S. LundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carson v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Nike, Inc. v. Comercial Iberica de Exclusivas Deportivas, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.