Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Rabe

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 15, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On June 12th, 1924, the parties entered into a written contract for the sale of certain real estate by the defendant to the complainant, under the terms of which title was to pass on August 2d of that year. No appearance was made by the complainant at that time, and, subsequently, on August 18th, notice was given to complainant, in writing, by the defendants through their attorney, fixing September 8th as the time, and the office of said attorney as the place for closing title and making time of the essence of the contract. The letter specifically stated that the defendants made time of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Orange Society of New Jerusalem v. KonskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  2. Doctorman v. SchroederSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
  3. Orange Society v. KonskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  4. Henry v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1904
  5. Siebold v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grossman v. WillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. Gorrie v. WintersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Cline v. KurzweilNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  4. Norton v. MillerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  5. Maihack v. MehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API