Grossman v. Will
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
Plaintiffs Perlin and Grossman each recovered a summary judgment by default on promissory notes, including attorney’s fees, against defendants Heide, husband and wife, “individually and as a community.” The court in each case denied defendants’ timely motions to set aside the judgment and then adhered to that denial on defendants’ respective motions for reconsideration. Defendants Heide appeal the judgments, the orders refusing to vacate them, and the denial of, the Heides’ motions for reconsideration. The appeals have been consolidated for hearing.
The basic question raised is whether Mrs.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- National Surety Corporation v. ShoemakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Washington Asphalt Co. v. Harold Kaeser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Precious v. O'RourkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Yeck v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Graves v. P. J. Taggares Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Myers v. OlsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Hutson v. Wenatchee Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Morgan v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- State v. DaultCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.