Legal Opinion
Eduardo Guzman v. Sandra Shewry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 15, 2009No. 08-55326PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed in this case on September 23, 2008, 544 F.3d 1073, is AMENDED as follows:
At page 13362, line 24, 544 F.3d at 1078, of the slip opinion, after the sentence concluding “halt the temporary suspension,” insert a new footnote reading <In his complaint, Guzman alleges that he also brings this claim directly under the Supremacy Clause. As such a claim is not “specifically and distinctly” put forward in his opening brief, we decline to consider it. See Entm’t Research Group, Inc. v. Genesis Creative Group, Inc., 122 F.3d 1211, 1217 (9th Cir.l997).>
The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of Indiana State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Monica Navarro Pimentel v Susan DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Harris v. Maricopa County Superior CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Skechers USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Planned Parenthood Arizona Inc v. Tom BetlachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.