Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. South Dakota
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY,
Circuit Judge.
This action involves a dispute between the State of South Dakota and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe over which of them will regulate hunting and fishing activity at the Fort Randall and Big Bend dam and reservoir projects. Between 1954 and 1962, the United States acquired portions of the Lower Brule Sioux Reservation along the Missouri River to construct the Fort Randall and Big Bend projects. South Dakota seeks to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over hunting and fishing on the reservation land taken by the federal government for these projects. The state contends that the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- South Dakota v. BourlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. State of South Dakota John Cooper, Secretary, Division of Game, Fish & Parks for the State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- South Dakota v. BourlandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Klamath Indian Tribe v. The Oregon Department of Fish and WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. State of South Dakota, and Jack Merwin, Secretary, Division of Game, Fish and Parks for the State of South Dakota, Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. State of South Dakota, and Jack Merwin, Secretary, Division of Game, Fish and Parks for the State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.