Legal Opinion
South Dakota v. Bourland
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 21, 1991No. Nos. 90-5486, 90-5515PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the District Court permanently enjoining the tribal defendants from regulating the hunting and fishing activities of nonmembers of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe (“Tribe”) on certain lands within the Cheyenne River Reservation. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand in part.1
I
The Great Sioux Reservation was established by the Treaty with the Sioux Indians, Apr. 29, 1868, 15 Stat. 635, 636 (“Fort Laramie Treaty”). It comprised virtually all of what is now South Dakota west of the Missouri River, as well as part of what is now…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. AND POWER v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. State of South DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1996
- Baker Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ChaskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.