Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Hunnicutt

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 1937No. 4-4620PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

This case was originally instituted to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by appellee while he was in the employ of the appellants. Appellee alleged that at the time of the accident he was engaged in interstate commerce in that he was at work upon a track used in connection with a coal chute which furnished coal for the operation of interstate trains upon appellants’ line of railroad; that-appellants were engaged in interstate commerce in that they were operating interstate trains over said railroad tráck which were supplied with coal from • said chute, the coal being necessary…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. YurkonisSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. ForemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Potter v. EasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Leonidas v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hallum v. BlackfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. Potter v. EasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API