Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Nelson county; Templeton, J. T. E. Pierce was convicted of maintaining a common nuisance in violation of the prohibition law, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Spalding, Oh. J.

The appellant was informed against on a charge of maintaining a common nuisance, in violation of the statute prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors in this state. Upon a verdict of guilty, judgment was pronounced. Erom this judgment he appeals.

The information charges the offense to have been committed in a building on lot 9, block 1, townsite of Dakota, in Nelson county, North Dakota. The names of a number of witnesses were indorsed on the information, but the names of one Johnson and one Kustebakke were not indorsed thereon. Upon the witness, Johnson, being sworn for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. AlbertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Hill v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. State v. MatejouskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State v. CambronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KilmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. MartyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State v. UhlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State v. JunglingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API