Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 2019No. 33/18PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

The past twenty years have seen a dramatic increase in heroin use, abuse, and accessibility. 1 Unsurprisingly, Maryland has experienced a correlating spike in heroin and opioid-related deaths. 2 Our State, and Marylanders alike, seek tools to combat this epidemic. We are asked to consider under what circumstances the dangers of heroin would justify holding a dealer liable for involuntary manslaughter for supplying the means by which his customer fatally overdoses. The issue is fraught. The perception of an epidemic cannot solely dictate its legally recognized danger. As our role requires, we…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burrage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beckwitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API