Legal Opinion

B. Blumenthal & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 19, 1950No. C. D. 1288Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise at bar, imported from Czechoslovakia, is described on the invoice as “fancy metal buttons.” They were assessed for duty at rates equivalent to 110 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1527 (c) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as “Articles valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces designed to be worn on apparel * * * such as and including * * * dress buttons * * * composed wholly or in chief value of metal.” The plaintiff has duly filed a protest claiming these buttons to be properly dutiable under the provisions of paragraph 349 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at 45…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Gaunt & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Lent v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Buss v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Protest 15159-K of Bailey Green & Eiger, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API