Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Chesapeake Ins. Co., Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 11, 1988No. 85 Civ. 7958 (JFK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS of FACT and CONCLUSIONS of LAW
KEENAN, District Judge:
Factual Findings
In the main, the facts have been stipulated to. They are also set forth in the Court’s Opinion and Order of January 30, 1987. Three witnesses testified at trial and the deposition of defendant Victor Posner was received. Where that testimony is relied on for a factual conclusion, the Court will so note. Otherwise, the stipulated facts are the source of the Court’s factual statements.
Plaintiff Mary Mayer (“Mayer”) brought this action pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”), 15…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blau v. LehmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Foremost-McKeeson, Inc. v. Provident Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,488 Texas International Airlines v. National Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,729 Cbi Industries, Inc. v. John T. HortonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Reece Corp. v. Walco National Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berry Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
- Mayer v. Chesapeake Insurance Company LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- C.R.A. Realty Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Mayer v. Chesapeake InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Berry Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995