Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Chesapeake Insurance Company Limited

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 26, 1989No. 791PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

877 F.2d 1154

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,504

Mary MAYER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CHESAPEAKE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, DWG Corporation, NVF

Company, National Propane Corporation, APL Corporation,

Chesapeake Financial Corporation, Southeastern Public

Service Company, Victor Posner, Peabody International

Corporation, The Pullman Company, and PTC Acquisition, Inc.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 791, Docket 88-7905.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 8, 1989.

Decided June 26, 1989.

Richard M. Meyer, New York City (Wendy K. Goidel, Milberg Weiss Bershad Specthrie & Lerach, New York City, on the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Blau v. LehmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Reliance Electric Co. v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. GAF Corp. v. MilsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter StolzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Mendell ex rel. Viacom Inc. v. GollustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. Mark Feder, Derivatively on Behalf of Ivax Corporation v. Philip Frost, Frost-Nevada, Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Mendell v. GollustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API